Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 03:47

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Tom Hanks finally breaks his silence on daughter’s bombshell memoir: ‘Not surprised’ - New York Post
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
The Toyota Supra Won't Stay Dead For Long - Motor1.com
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Target and Walmart tariff price hikes leak online from an unlikely source - Mashable
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Upcoming temporary full closure of South Academy Boulevard for widening project - KKTV
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Jury In Harvey Weinstein Rape Retrial Set To Start Deliberations Wednesday – Update - Deadline
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
US Steel workers see hope of job security in deal with Japan’s Nippon - Financial Times
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.